ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ· Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΡΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°: Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΠ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΠ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 6 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅… Π§ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ Π΅ΡΡ >
- Π‘ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅
- ΠΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ°
- ΠΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°
- ΠΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ
- ΠΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡ Π² Π½Π°ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ
Π‘ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅
- Π‘ΠΠΠ‘ΠΠ Π‘ΠΠΠ ΠΠ©ΠΠΠΠ
- ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ."
- ΠΠΠΠΠ 1. ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠ ΠΠ’Π£Π Π«
- 1. 1. ΠΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°
- 1. 1. 1. ΠΠ΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΈ Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
- 1. 1. 2. Π Π΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°
- 1. 2. Π Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°
- 1. 3. ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ
- 1. 4. Π€Π°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ, Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ· Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°
- 1. 5. ΠΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°
- 1. 5. 1. ΠΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΌΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°
- 1. 5. 2. ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ
- 1. 5. 3. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°
- 1. 5. 4. ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΠΠΠ’ Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ
- 1. 1. ΠΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°
- 2. 1. ΠΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅
- 2. 2. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
- 2. 3. Π₯ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
- 2. 4. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ
- 2. 5. ΠΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’
- 2. 6. Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°
- 3. 1. Π₯Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ
- 3. 2. ΠΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ Π³Π»ΡΠ±ΠΈΠ½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ
- 3. 3. Π‘ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°
- 3. 3. 1. ΠΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π€Π Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°
- 3. 3. 2. ΠΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ
- 3. 4. Π Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°
- 3. 5. ΠΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ
- 3. 6. Π‘ΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°
- 3. 7. ΠΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ· Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΡΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ (ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Ρ, ΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ, Π΄ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ)
Π Π°Π½Π½Π΅Π΅ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° (ΠΠ) ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° (ΠΠ) ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ [7−11]. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ, Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ°Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»Π°ΠΌ Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³Π΄Π° ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° [35, 36]. ΠΡΠΎ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ΄Π° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° [74], ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ· ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° [35, 36]. ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°, ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΠ. ΠΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Π½Π΅ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ [72, 168].
Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ Ρ ΠΠΠ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ (Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’) ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΠ [101, 161]. ΠΡΠΎ Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΠ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΆΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ°Ρ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π·ΠΈΡΠΈΡ.
ΠΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° [137, 157, 162] ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π² ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ [72, 168], Π² ΡΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ.
Π£ΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΈ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΠ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ°, ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅.
Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ: ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ· Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’ Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 6 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.
ΠΠ°Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ:
1. ΠΠ·ΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ (Π΄ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π° Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 24 ΡΠ°ΡΠ°, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄ Π²ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 1 ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 6 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΠ).
2. ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ «ΡΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°» Π² ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΡ ΠΎΠΊΠΊΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡ-ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ.
3. ΠΠ·ΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° (Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ) ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ.
4. Π‘ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’ Ρ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ· ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 6 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ.
ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°: Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΠ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΠ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 6 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈ Π±ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ, Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΠΊΠΊΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡ-ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΠΠ‘Π). ΠΡΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°, ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΠ. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°, ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΡΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° (ΠΠ‘Π), Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΠ‘Π. ΠΡΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ° Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.
ΠΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ: Π Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’ Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΠ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΠ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΠ Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ, Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Ρ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°Π·Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ°. ΠΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’ Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ Π² 1 -Π΅ ΡΡΡΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 24 ΡΠ°ΡΠ°, 10 Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 1 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈ 6 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² ΠΎΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π° Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ.
ΠΠ½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π² ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π½Π΅ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ Π² Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΡΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠΌ. Π. Π. ΠΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Π ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ Π Π€.
ΠΠ«ΠΠΠΠ«.
1. ΠΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’ Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Ρ Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ Π³Π»ΡΠ±ΠΈΠ½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΡ ΠΎΠΊΠΊΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½Π½Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π°.
2. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ «ΡΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°», ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΡΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°, Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ Π±Π΅Π· ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ.
3. ΠΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°, ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°. ΠΠ΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π€Π ΠΠ, ΠΠ, ΠΠΠΠ, ΠΠ‘ΠΠ Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΡΡ Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’ Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ.
4. Π£Π»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ ΡΡΠΈΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°.
ΠΠ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠ§ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ Π ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠ.
1. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ Π‘-ΠΠΠΠ’ Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΠ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°, ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΠ.
2. ΠΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΠ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 24 ΡΠ°ΡΠ°, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 10−14 Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ, 1 ΠΈ 6 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² ΠΎΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π° Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ.
Π‘ΠΏΠΈΡΠΎΠΊ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ
- Wood Π. A., Spores J., Notske R., et al. Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 1980- 303: 897−902.
- Ganz W., Buchbinder N., Marcus H., et al. Intracoronary thrombolysis in evolving myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 1981- 101:4−13.
- Reimer K., Jennings R. Factors involved in salvaging ischemic myocardium: effect of reperfusion of arterial blood. Circulation 1983- 68 suppl I: 125−36.
- Reimer K., Jennings R. The «wavefront phenomenon» of myocardial ischemic cell death. Transmural progression of necrosis within the framework of ischemic bed size /myocardium at risk/ and collateral flow. Lab. Invest. 1979- 40: 633−44.
- Reimer K., Lowe J., Rasmussen M., et al. The «wavefront phenomenon» of ischemic cell death: myocardial infarction size versus duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977- 56: 786−94.
- Π§Π°Π·ΠΎΠ² E. Π., ΠΠ°ΡΠ²Π΅Π΅Π²Π° Jl. Π‘., ΠΠ°Π·Π°Π΅Π² Π. Π. Ρ ΡΠΎΠ°Π²Ρ. ΠΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°. Π’Π΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅Π²ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ² 1976- 4: 8−19.
- Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptohinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico. Long-term effects of intravenous thrombolysisin acute myocardial infarction: final report of the GISSI Study. Lancet 1988- 2: 871−4.
- The ISAM Study Group. A prospective trial of Intravenous Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ISAM): mortality, morbidity and infarct size at 21 days. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986- 314: 1465−71.
- ISIS 2 Colloborative Group. Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17 187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS 2. Lancet 1988- 2: 349−60.
- The AIMS Trial Study Group. Effect of intravenous APSAC on mortality after acute myocardial infarction: preliminary report of a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet 1988- 1: 545−9.
- Vorcheimer D. A. GUSTO I medication errors abstract. Circulation 1997−96 (suppl I):535.
- The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO III) Investigators. A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction. N. Engll. J. Med. 1997−337:1118−1123.
- Topol E. J. Toward a new frontier in myocardial reperfusion therapy. Emerging platelet preeminence. Circulation 1998−97:211−218.
- Gassier J. P., Topol E. J. Reperfusion revisited: beyond TIMI 3 flow. Clin Cardiol. 1999- 22 (suppl IV): IV 20-IV 29.
- Kleiman N. S., Ohman E. M., CaliffR. M., Topol E. J. et al. Profound inhibition of platelet aggregation with monoclonal antibody 7E3 Fab after trombolytic therapy: results of the Trombolysis and Angioplasty in
- Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) 8 pilot study. J. Allergy. Clin. Immunol. 1993- 22: 381−89.
- Stone G. W.,, Rutherford B. D., McConahay D. R., et al. Direct coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: outcome in patients with single vessel disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990- 15: 534−43.
- Neuman F. J., Kosa I., Dickfeld T., et al. Recovery of myocardial perfusion in acute myocardial infarction after successful balloon angioplasty and stent placement in the infarct-related coronary artery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1997- 30: 1270−76.
- Behrenbeck T., Patricia A. P., Kenneth C. H., et al. Primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction: assessment of Improved myocardial perfusion with Technetium-99m Isonitrile. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1991- 17: 365−72.
- Hartzler G. O., Rutherford B. D., McConahay D. R., et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with and without thrombolytic therapy for treatment acute myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 1983- 106: 965−73.
- Hartzler G. 0.,, Rutherford B. D., McConahay D. R., et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: application for acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1984- 53: 17C-21C.
- Kimura T., Nosaka H., Ueno K., Nobuyoshi M. Role of coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 1984- 107: 820−2.
- Rothbaum D. A., Linnemeir T. J., Landin R. J., et al. Emergency percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: a 3 year experience. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1987- 10: 264−72.
- Marco J., Caster L., Szatmary L. J., Fajadet J. Emergency percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty without thrombolysis as initial therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 1987- 15: 55−63.
- O’Keefe J. H., Rutherford B. D., McConahay D. R., et al. Early and late results of coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytis therapy for acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1989- 64: 1221−30.
- Topol E. J. Coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Ann. Intern. Med. 1988- 109: 970−80.
- Ellis S. G., O’Neill W. W., Bates E. R., et al. Coronary angioplasty as primary therapy for acute myocardial infarction 6 to 48 hours after sympton onset: repot of an initial experience. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1989- 13: 1122−6.
- Topol E. J. RAPPORT: outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction with abciximab and primary PTCA. Presented at the XIX Congress of the European Society of Cardiology, Stockholm, Sweden, August 24−28,1997.
- Serruys P.W., de Jaegere P., Kiemeneij F. et al for the BENESTENT Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994- 331:489−95.
- Eleckhout E., Kern M. J. The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanism and therapies. Eur. Heart J. 2001- 22: 729−39.
- Ven de Werf F. Discrepancies between the effect of coronary reperfusion on survival and left ventricular function. Lancet 1989- 1: 1367−69.
- Gibson C. M., Cannon C. P., Daley W. L. et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 1996- 93: 879−88.
- Krug A., de Rochemont W. M., Korb G. Blood supply to the myocardium after temporary coronary occlusion. Circ. Res. 1966- 19: 57−62.
- Kloner R. A., Ganote C. E., Jennings R. B. The «no-reflow» phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J. Clin. Invest. 1974- 54: 1496−508.
- Schofer J., Montz R., Mathey D. G. Scintigraphic evidence of the «no-reflow» phenomenon in human beings after coronary thrombolysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1985−5:593−98.
- Ito H., Tomooka T., Sakai N., et al. Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrjmbolysis. Circulation 1992- 85: 1699−1705.
- Ito H., Maruyama A., Iwakura K., et al. Clinical implications of the «no-reflow» phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996- 93: 223−228.
- Morishima J., Sone T., Mokuno S. et al. Clinical significance of no-reflow phenomenon observed on angiography after successful treatment of acutemyocardial infarction with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am. Heart J. 1995- 130: 239−243.
- Boli R., Triana J. E., Jeround M. O. Prolonged impairment of coronary vasodilation after reversible ischemia. Evidence for microvascular stunning. Circulat. Res. 1990: 67: 332−43.
- Kloner R. A. Does reperfusion exist in human? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1993- 21:3775−81.
- Ambrosio G., Weisman H. F., Mannisi J. A., Becker L. C. Progressive impairment of regional myocardial perfusion after initial restoration of postischemic blood flow. Circulation 1989- 80: 1846−61.
- Kloner R. A., Rude R. E., Carlson N., et al. Ultrastructural evidence of microvascular damage and myocardial cell injury after coronary occlusion: which comes fist? Circulation 1980- 62. 945−52.
- Seydoux C., Goy J. J., Davies G. Platelet and neutrophyl imagina techniques in the investigation of the response to thrombolytic therapy and the no-reflow phenomenon. Am. Heart J. 1993- 125: 1142−47.
- Bolli R. Mechanism of myocardial «stunning». Circulation 1990- 82: 72 338.
- Braunwald E., Kloner R. A., et al. The stunned myocardium: pro- longed, postichemic ventricular dysfynction. Circulation 1982- 66: 1146−49.
- Downing S. E. Wall tension and myocardial dysfynction after ischemic and reperfusion. Am. J. Physiol. 1993- 264: 386−93.
- Ferrari R., La Canna G., Glubbini R., et al. Hibernating myocardium in patients with coronary artery disease: identification and clinical importance. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 1992- 6: 287−93.
- Π‘ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π° Π . Π., ΠΠ΄Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² Π. Π‘. ΠΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ «ΠΎΠ³Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ» ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ Π°ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ 1999- 10: 23−6.
- Birnbaum J., Kloner R. A. Therapy for myocardial stunning. Ibid 1996- 1035.
- Pfeffer M. A., Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: experimental observation and clinical implications. Circulation 1990- 81: 1161−72.
- Sabbah H. N., Goldstein S. Ventricular remodelling: consequences and therapy. Eur. Heart J. 1993- 14: C: 24−29.
- Eng C., Zhao M., Factor S. M., Sonnenblick E. H. Post-ischaemic cardiac dilatation and remodeling: reperfusion injury of the interstitium. Eur. Heart J. 1993- 14: A: 27−32.
- Hutchins G. M., Bulkley Π. H. Infarct expansion versus extension: two diffrenet complication of acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1978- 41: 1127−32.
- Welsman H. R., Bush D. Π., Mannisti J.A., et al. Cellular mechanisms of myocardial infarction expansion. Circulation 1988- 78: 184−201.
- Irimpen A. M., Tenaglia A. N., Scin D. J., Buda A. J. Lack of ventricular remodeling in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 1996- 131: 466−71.
- The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators. Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. Lancet 1993- 342: 821−28.
- Picard M. H., Wilkins G. T., Gollam L. D. et al. Immediate regional endocardial surface expansion following coronary occlusion in the canine left ventricle: disproportionate effects of anterior versus inferior ischemia. Am. Heart J. 1991- 121:753−62.
- Jeremy R. W., Allman K. C., Bautovitch G., et al. Patterns of left ventricular dilatation during the six months after myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1989- 33: 304−10.
- Anderson J. L., Marshall H. W., Bray B. E., et al. A randomized trial of streptokinase in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983- 308: 1312−18.
- Blanke H., Scherff F., Karsch K.R., et al. Electrocardiographic changes after streptokinase-induced recanalization in patients with acute left anterior descending artery obstruction. Circulation 1983- 68: 406−12.
- Von Essen R., Schmidt W., Vebis R., et al. Myocardial infarction and thrombolysis: electrocardiografic short and long term results using precordial mapping. Br. Heart J. 1985- 54: 6−10.
- Bren G. B., Wasserman A. G., Ross A. M. The electrocardiogram in patients undergoing thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987- 76 (suppl II): 11−18−24.
- Galli M., Marcassa C., Bolli R., et al. Spontaneous delayed recovery of perfusion and contraction after the first 5 weeks after anterior infarction. Circulation 1994- 90: 1386−97.
- Pfisterer M., Zuberg M., Wenzel R., Burkart F. Prolonged myocardial stunning after thrombolysis: can left ventricular function be assessed definitely at hospital discharge? Eur. Heart J. 1991- 12: 214−217.
- Rahimtola S. The hibernating myocardium. Am. Heart J. 1989- 117: 211 -221.
- Kim R. J., Lima A. C., Chen E-L, et al. Fast 23Na Magnetic resonance imaging of acute reperfused myocardial infarction. Am. Heart Association 1997- 95: 1877−85.
- Niemeyer M. G., Van der Wall E. E., de Roos A., et al. Assessement of acute myocardial infarction by nuclear imaging techniques. Angiology 1992- 9: 720−733.
- Bouchard A., Reeves R. S., Cranney G., et al. Assessement of myocardial infarct size by means of T2-weighted 1H nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Am. Heart J. 1989- 117: 281−9.
- De Roos A., Matheijssen N. A. A., Doornbos J., et al. Assessement of myocardial infarct size after reperfusion therapy using gadolinium-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1990- 176: 517−21.
- Van Rossum A. C., Visser F. C., Van Eenige M. J., et al. Value of gadolinium-DTPA dynamics in magnetic resonance imaging of acutemyocardial infarction with occluded and reperfused coronary arteries after thrombolysis. Am. J. Cardiol. 1990- 65: 845−51.
- Camici P. G. Positron emission tomography and myocardial imaging. Heart 2000- 83: 475−80.
- Jeremy R. W., Links J. M., Becker L. C. Progressive failure of coronary flow during reperfusion of myocardial infarction: documentation of the no-reflow phenomenon with positron emission tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990- 16: 695−704.
- Rogers W. J., Bourge R. C., Papapietro S. E., et al. Variables predictive of good functional outcome following thrombolytic therapy in the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) phase II study. Am. J. Cardiol. 1989- 63: 503−12.
- Taylor Y. I., Humphries I. O., Mellits E. D., et al. Predictors of clinical course, coronary anatomy and left ventricular function after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1980- 62: 960−70.
- The Multicenter Post-infarction Research Group. Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983- 309: 331−36.
- Rogers W. J., Smith L. R., Oberman A., et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical management of patients after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1980, 62 (suppl I): I-67-I-74.
- Schulman S. P., Achuff S. C., Giffith L. S. C., et al. Prognostic cardiac catheterization variables in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a five years prospective study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1988- 11: 1164−72.
- Perez-Gonsalez J. F., Botvinick E. H., Dunn R. Et al. Late prognostic value of scintigraphic parameters of acute scintigraphic measurement of myocardial infarction size. Circulation 1982- 66: 960−71.
- Miller T. D., Hodge D. O., Sutton J. M., et al. Technetium-99m sestamibi infarct size predicts mortality. Am. J. Cardiol. 1998−81: 1491−93.
- Miller T. D., Christian T. F., Hodge D. O., et al. Infarct size after acute myocardial infarction measured quantitative tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging subsequent mortality. Circulation 1995- 92: 334−41.
- Burns R. J., Gibbons R. J., Roberts R. S., et al. LV function and infarct size predict six-month mortality post myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. Circulation 1996- 94 (suppl I): 1−655.
- Feiring A. J., Johnson M. R., Kioschos J. M., et al. The importance of the myocardial area at risk in the evaluation of the outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients. Circulation 1987−75: 980−987.
- White H. D., Norris R. M., Brown M. A., et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987- 76- 44−51.
- Π‘Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΉΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Π. E., Π¨ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π² Π. Π., Π‘ΠΊΡΠΈΠ΄Π»Π΅Π²ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ E. Π., ΠΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠ½ P. C. ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. 1996 Π³. № 6. Π‘ΡΡ. 34−35.
- Π‘Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΉΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ JT. Π. ΠΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Π² ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄. Π½Π°ΡΠΊ. ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Π°. 1998 Π³.
- Π‘Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Π. Π. ΠΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠΏΡΡ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄. Π½Π°ΡΠΊ. ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Π° 1984 Π³.
- Π‘Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Π. Π, Π©Π΅ΡΠ±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈΠ½ JI. Π., ΠΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Π. Π. ΠΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Ρ 201Π’1 Π² Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΡΠ°. Π’Π΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅Π²ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ² 1985. № 4. Π‘ΡΡ. 95−99.
- Π‘Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Π. Π., Π‘Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΉΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ J1.E., Π₯ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π²Π° Π. Π., ΠΠ°ΡΠ° Π‘. Π. ΠΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°: Π²Π·Π³Π»ΡΠ΄ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 25 Π»Π΅Ρ. ΠΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π²ΡΠ°Ρ 1999, 15: 20−24.
- Wahba F. Π., Bavelaar-Croon D. L., Baur Π. Π. et al. Detection of residual wall motion after sustained myocardial infarction by gated 99m-tetrofosmin SPECT: a comparison with echocardioraphy. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2001- 22: 175−82.
- ΠΠ°ΡΠ° Π‘. Π., ΠΠΈΡ Π΅Π΅Π² Π. Π., Π‘Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Π. Π. Π‘ΠΈΠ½Ρ ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Ρ 99ΠΌΠ’Ρ-ΠΠΠΠ Π² ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°. ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ 2000- 1: 21−25.
- Achtert A. D., King Π. A., Dahlberg S. Π’. et al. An investigation of the estimation of ejection fractions and cardiac volumes by a quantitative gated SPECT software package in simulated gated SPECT images. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 1998- 5: 144−52.
- Duska F., Vizda J., Kubicek J., et. al. The sinsitivity of scintigraphic myocardial imaging by the use of 99m-Tc- labeled pyraphosphate in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy of various etiology. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1979, V 4, p 87−90.
- ΠΠ²ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΠ½Π° Π. Π‘. ΠΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Ρ 99 ΠΌ Π’Ρ-ΠΏΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌ. ΠΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄. Π½Π°ΡΠΊ. ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Π° 1980.
- Eckelman W. Π‘., Reba R. S., Kubota Π., et. al. 99m Π’Ρ pyraphosphate for bone imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 1976, V 15, p 274−83.
- Khaw B. A., Gold H. K., Yasuda T. et al. Scintigraphic quantification of myocardial necrosis in patients after intravenous injection of myosin-specific antibody. Circulation 1986- 74: 501−8.
- Wackers F. J. Π’., Busseman S. E., Samson G., et al. Value and limitations of thallium-201 scintigraphy in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 1976- 295: 1−5.
- Tamaki S., Kambara H., Suzuki Y., et al. Improved detection of myocardial infarction by emission computed tomography with thallium-201. Relation to infarct size. Br. Heart J. 1984- 52: 621−27.
- Ritchie J.L., Williams D. L., Harp G., et al. Transaxial quantitl tomography with thallium-201 for detecting remote myocardial infarction. Comparison with planar imaging. Am. J. Cardol. 1982- 50: 1236−41.
- Kichner P. Infarct size with thallium-201 scintigraphy. Am. J. Cardol. 1990- 4: 46−58.
- DiCola V. C., Downing S. E., Donabedian R. K, et al. Pathophysiological correlates of thallium-201 myocardial uptake in experimental infarction. Cardiovasc. Res. 1977- 11: 141−46.
- Okada R. D., Lim Y. L., Kaul S., et al. Quantitation of myocardial infarct size from thallium-201 images: Validation of a new approach in an experimental model. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1984- 3: 948−55.
- Nelson A. D., Khullar S., Budd G. S., et al. ation of thallium-201 scintigrams in acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 1979- 44: 664−69.
- Kaul S., Okada R. D., Pandian N. G., et al. Determination of left ventricular «area at risk» with high-resolution single photon emission computerized tomography in experimental coronary occlusion. Am. Heart J. 1985- 109: 1369−74.
- Prigent F., Maddahi J., Garcia E. V., et al. Quantification of myocardial infarct size by thallium-201 single photon emission computerized tomography: Experimental validation in the dog. Circulation 1986- 74: 85 261.
- Prigent F., Maddahi J., Garcia E. V., et al. Comparative methods for quantifying myocardial infarct size by thallium-201 SPECT. J. Nucl. Med. 1987- 28: 325−33.
- Weiss R. J., Buda A. J., Pasyk S., et al. Noninvasive quantification of jeopardized myocardial mass in dogs using 2-dimensional echocardiography and thallium-201 tomography. Am. J. Cardiol. 1983- 52: 1340−44.
- Keyes J. W., Brady T. J., Leonard P. F., et al. Calculation of viable and infarcted myocardial mass from thallium-201 tomograms. J. Nucl. Med. 1981- 22: 339−43.
- Gerber K. H., Higgins C. B. Quantitation of size of myocardial infarctions by computerized transmission tomography. Invest. Radiol. 1983- 18: 238−44.
- Granato J. E., Watson D. D., Flanagan T. L., et al. Myocardial thallium-201 kinetics during coronary occlusion and reperfusion: Influence of method of reflow and timing of thallium-201 administration. Circulation 1986- 73: 150 160.
- Reduto L. A., Freund G. S., Garcia J. M. Coronary artery reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: Benefical effects of intracoronary streptokinase on left ventricular salvage and perfomance. Am. Heart J. 1981- 102: 1162−77.
- De Coster P. M., Melin J. A., Detry J. M., et al. Coronary artery reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: Assessment by pre- and postintervention thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. Am. J. Cardiol. 1985- 55: 88 995.
- Schwarz F., Hofmann M., Schuler G., et al. Thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: Effect of intravenous followed by intracoronary streptokinase application on estimates of infarct size. Am. J. Cardiol. 1984- 53: 1505−10.
- Schuler G., Schwarz F., Hofmann M., et al. Thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction using intracoronary streptokinase: Assessment by thallium-201 scintigraphy. Circulation 1982- 66: 658−664.
- Ritchie J. L., Davis K. B., Williams D. L., et al. Global and regional left ventricular function and tomographic radionuclide perfusion: The Western Washington Intracoronary Streptokinase in Myocardial Infarction Trial. Circulation 1984- 70: 867−75.
- Deutsch E., Glavan K. A., Sodd V. J., et al. Cationic 99m Tc complexes as potential myocardial agents. J. Nucl. Med. 1981- V 22: 897−907.
- Holman B. L., Jones A. G., Lister-James I, et al. A new Tc-99m-labeled myocardial imaging agent, Hexakis (t-Butylisonitril)-Technetium (1) (Tc-99m TBI): initial experience in the human. J. Nucl. Med. 1984- V 25: 13 501 355.
- Jones A. G., Abrams M. I., Davison A., et al. Biological studies of new class of technetium complexes: the Hexakis (alkilisonitril) — technetium (1) cations. Int. J. Nucl. Med. Biol., 1989- V 11: 225−34.
- Maddahi J., Roy L., Van Train K., et al. The first United States experiens in normal human myocardial imaging with Tc-99 metoxy isobutyl isonitrile (RP-30). Clin. Nucl. Med. 1986- V 11: 17 abst.
- Berman D. S., Kiat H., Van Train K., et al. Technetium 99m sestamibi in the assessment of chronic coronary artery disease. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1991- V. 21: p. 190−212.
- Sinusas A. J., Trautman K. A., Bergin J. D., et al. Quantification of area risk during coronary occlusion and degree of myocardial salvage after reperfusion with technetium-99m methoxyisobutyl isonitrile. Circulation 1990- V. 82: p. 1424−37.
- Okada R. D., Glover D., Gaffney T., Williams S. Myocardial kinetics of technetium-99m-methoxy-2-methylpropyl-isonitrile. Circulation 1988- V. 77: p. 491−98.
- Glover D., Okada R. D. Myocardial kinetics of Tc-MIBI in canine myocardium after dipyridamole. Circulation 1990- V. 81: p. 628−37.
- Canby R. C., Silber S., Pohost G. M. Relations of the myocardial imaging agents 99mTc-MIBI and 201T1 to myocardial blood flow in a canine model of myocardial ischemic insult. Circulation 1990- V. 81: p. 289−96.
- Beller G. A., Glover D. K., Ruiz M., et al. 99mTc-sestamibi uptake and retention during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Circulation 1993- V. 87: p. 2033−42.
- Medrano R., Lowry R. W., Young U. B., et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with 99mTc sestamibi in patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. Circulation 1996- V. 94: p. 1010−1017.
- Maes A. F., Borges M., Flameng W., et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in chronic coronary artery disease using 99mTc sestamibi SPECT. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1997- V. 29: p. 62−68.
- Christian T. F., Gibbons R. J., Gersh B. J. Effect of infarct location on myocardial salvage assessed by technetium-99m isonitrile. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1991- 17: 1303−1308.
- Hvid-Jacobsen K., Moller J. T., Kjller E., et al. Myocardial perfusion at fatal infarction: Location and size of scintigraphic defects. J. Nucl. Med. 1992- V. 33: p. 251−53.
- Feiring A. J., Johnson M. R., Kioschos J. M., et al. The importance of th determination of the myocardial area at risk in the evaluation of the outcome c acute myocardial infarction in patients. Circulation 1987- V. 75: p. 980−87.
- Christian T. F., Schwartz R. S., Gibbons R. J. Determinants of infarct size i reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992- V. 86: j 81−90.
- Gibbons R. J., Miller T. D., Christian T. F. Infarct size measured by single photon emission computed tomographic imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi. Circulation 2000- 11: 101−108.
- Gibbons R. J., Holmens D. R., Reeder G. S., et. al. Immidiate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by concervative treatment for myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993- 328: 685−91.
- Schaer G. L., Spaccarento L. J., Bronne K. F., et. al. Beneficial effects of RheothRX injection in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996- V.94: p. 298−307.
- O’Keefe J. H., Grines C. L., DeWood M. A., et. al. Poloxamer-188 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 1996- V. 78: p. 747−50.
- Collaborative Organization for RheothRX Evaluation (CORE). Effects of RheothRX on mortality, morbidity, left ventricular function, and infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1997- V.96: p. 192 201.
- Chareonthaitawee P., Christian T. F., Hirose K., et. al. Relation of infarct size t extent of left ventricular remodeling in the year after acute myocardial infarctioi J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995- 25: 567−73.
- Christian T. F., Behrenbek T., Gersh B. J., Gibbons R. J. Relation of left ventricular volume and function over one year after acute myocardial infarction to infarct size determined by technetium-99m sestamibi. J. Am. Cardiol. 1991- 68: 21−26.
- Christian T. F., Clements I. P., Gibbons R. J. Noninvasive identification (myocardium at risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction and nondiagnosti electrocardiograms with technetium-99m sestamibi. Circulation 1991- V. 83:. 1615−20.
- Wackers F. J., Gibbons R. J., Verani M. S., et al. Serial quantitative plam technetium-99m isonitrile imaging in acute myocardial infarction: Efficacy fcnoninvasive assessment of thrombolytic therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1989- 14: p. 861−873.
- Gibson W. S., Behrenbeck Π’., Pellikka P. A., et al. Serial tomographic imagin with technetium-99m-sestamibi for the assessment of infact-related arteri- patency following reperfusion therapy. J. Nucl. Med. 1992- V- 33: p. 2080−85.
- Behrenbeck Π’., Pellikka P. A., Gersh B. J. Primary angioplasty in myocardi- infarction: Assessment of improved myocardial perfusion with technetium-99i sestamibi. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1991- V. 17: p. 365−72.
- Clements I. P., Christian T. F., Higano S. Π’., et al. Residual flow to the infari zone as a determinant of infarct size after direct angioplsty. Circulation 1993- 88: p. 1527−33.
- Π‘ΠΌΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π. Π. ΠΠΎΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°. ΠΡΠ»Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΠΠΠ¦ ΠΠΠ Π‘Π‘Π‘Π 1988- 11:112−13.
- Germano G., Erel J., Kiat H. et al. Quantitative LFEF and qualitative regional function from gated thallium-201 perfusion SPECT. J. Nucl. Med. 1997- 38: 379−54.
- Wahba F. F. M., Bavelaar-Croon C. D. L., Baur L. H. B. et al. Detection of residual wall motion after sustained myocardial infarction by gated 99mTctetrofosmin SPECT: a comparison with echocardiography. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2001- 22: 175−82.
- Wahba F. F. M., Lamb H. J., Bax J. J. et al. Assessment of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening by gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2001- 22: 663−71.
- Bax J. J., Lamb H. J., Dibbets P. et al. Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopaty. Am. J. Cardiol. 2000- 15: 1299−1305.
- Bavelaar-Croon C. D. L., Astma D. E., Van Der Wall E. E. et al. The additive value of gated SPET myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known and suspected coronary artery disease. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2001- 22: 4555.
- Kalbfleisch H., Hort W. Quantitative study on the size of coronary artery supplying areas postmorten. Am. Heart J. 1977- 94: 183−88.
- Gibbons R. J., Holmens D. R., Reeder G. S., et. al. Immidiate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed byconcervative treatment for myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993- 328: 685−91.
- Π’Π°Π»Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π° Π. E. ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΡ ΠΈΠ² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ 1998- 7: 63−70.
- Rentrop Π. R., Feit F., Sherman W., Thorton J. Π‘. Serial angiographic assessment of coronary obstruction and collateral flow in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1989- 80: 1166−75.
- Schwartz H., Leiboff R. H., Bren G. E. et al. Temporal evolution collateral circulation after myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1984- 4: 108 893.
- Faraggi M., Montalescot G., Sarda L. et al. Spontaneous late improvement of myocardial viability in the chronic infarct zone is possible, depending on persistent TIMI 3 flow and a low grade stenosis of the infarct artery. Heart 1999−81:424−30.
- ΠΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° H. Π‘. ΠΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΡΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°. ΠΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄. Π½Π°ΡΠΊ. ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Π° 1993.
- Anderson J. L., Marshall H. W., Askins J. C., et. al. A randomized trial of intravenous and intracoronary streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction Circulation 1984- 70: 606−18.
- Kennedy J. W., Martin G., Devis K., et. al. The western Waschington intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction randomized trial. Circulation. 1988- 77: 345−50.
- Guerci A. D., Gerstenblith G., Brinker J. A. et al. A randomized trial of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction with subsequent randomization to elective coronary angioplasty. N. Engl. J. Med. 19Π¬7- 317: 1613−1618.
- Charuzi Y., Beeder C., Marshall L. A. et al. Improvement in regional and global ventricular function after intracoronary thrombolysis: assessment with two-dimensional echocardiography. Am. J. Cardiol. 1984- 53: 662−665.
- Harrison J. K., Calif R. M., Woodlief L. H. et al. Systolic left ventricular function after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993- 87: 1531−41.
- Π¨Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅Π² Π. Π. ΠΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡ Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΠ΅ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°. Π’Π΅Ρ. Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ². 1996- 5: 55−56.
- Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠΎΠ² Π. Π. Π’ΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΠΠ. ΠΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄. Π½Π°ΡΠΊ. ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Π°. 1993.
- Belenkie I., Knudston M. L., RothD. L. et al. Relation between flow grade after trombolytic therapy and the effect of angioplasty on left ventricular function: a prospective randomized trial. Am. Heart J. 1991- 121: 407−16.
- Bourdillion D. V., Broderick T. M., Williams E. S. et al. Early recovery of regional left ventricular function after reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction assessed by serial two-dimensional echocardiography. Am. J. Cardiol. 1989- 63: 641−646.
- Picard M. H., Wilkins G. T., Ray P., Weyman A. E. Long-term effects of acute thrombolytic therapy on ventricular size and function. Am. Heart J. 1993- 1: 1−10.
- Pirolo J. S., Hutchins G. M., Moore G. W. Infarct expansion: pathologic analysis of 204 patients with a single myocardial infarct. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1986- 7: 349−354.
- Warren S. E., Royal H. D., Markis J. E. et al. Time course of left ventricular dilatation after myocardial infarction: influence of infarct-related artery and success of coronary thrombolysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1988- 11: 12−19.
- McKay R. G., Pfeffer M. A., Pasternak R. C. et al. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: a corollary to infarct expansion. Circulation 1986- 74: 693−702.
- Warren S. E., Royal H. D., Markis J. E. et al. Time course of left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction: influence of infarct-related artery and success of coronary thrombolysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1988- 11: 12−9.
- Jeremy R. W, Hackworthy R. A., Bautovich G. et al. Infarct artery perfusion and changes in left ventricular volume in month after acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1987- 9: 989−995.
- Hochman J. S.7 Choo H. Limitation of myocardial infarct expansion by reperfusion independent of myocardial salvage. Circulation 1987- 75: 299 306.
- Glass B. A., Carter R. L., Albert H. M. Excision of myocardial infarcts. Arch. Surg. 1968- 97:940−46.
- McCallister B. D., Christian T. F., Gersh B. J. et al. Prognosis of myocardial infarctions involving more than 40% of the left ventricle after acute reperfusion therapy. Circulation. 1993- 88: 1470−75.
- In-hospital results and one-year follow-ap of GISSI trial (Gruppo Jtaliano per lo Studo: della Streptochinasi hell infarto miocardo) GISSI. J. Ital. Cardiol. 1987- 17: 20−29.
- Π§Π°Π·ΠΎΠ² E. Π., Π ΡΠ΄Π° M. Π―., ΠΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»Π°Π΅Π²Π° Π. Π€. ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°. Π’Π΅Ρ. ΠΡΡ ΠΈΠ² 1987- 2: 5−12.
- ΠΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π. Π., Π ΠΎΠ·Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² Π. Π., Π‘ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π° Π. Π. Ρ ΡΠΎΠ°Π²Ρ. ΠΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ. 2001- 3: 13−16.
- Di Carli Π., Davidson Π., Little R. et al. Value of metabolic imaging with positron emission tomographic for evaluating prognostic in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Am. J. Cardiol. 1994- 73: 527−33.
- Bax J. J., Cornel J. H., Visser E. C. et al. Relation between extent of dysfunctional yet viable myocardium and improvement in LVEF after revascularization. (Abstr.) Eur. Heart J. 1997- 18: 574.